kirupa
07-25 01:35 AM
Added!
wallpaper Keira Knightley#39;s bob
Blog Feeds
12-10 05:20 PM
The Center for American Progress has released a report that urges an end to the "arbitrary restrictions" on H-1B visas and replacing the 65,000 quota with a market-based system where numbers rise in a strong economy and drop in a weak one. The report also recommends stronger enforcement mechanisms to prevent fraud and abuse.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/report-urges-liberalizing-h1b-quotas-but-also-tougher-enforcement-of-rules.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/report-urges-liberalizing-h1b-quotas-but-also-tougher-enforcement-of-rules.html)
nishu
01-25 08:26 PM
I am in little trouble.please help.
I will be graduating in May'07. I am not eligible for OPT. I have a job offer and the company will be applying for my H1 in April. But I cannot start working before October.
1.Is there any way I can start working in May?
2. what options do I have to stay legally in US from May-Oct?
please advice..
I will be graduating in May'07. I am not eligible for OPT. I have a job offer and the company will be applying for my H1 in April. But I cannot start working before October.
1.Is there any way I can start working in May?
2. what options do I have to stay legally in US from May-Oct?
please advice..
2011 Keira Knightley Hairstyles
TomPlate
07-02 09:53 AM
1. Country of Birth : India
2. Approval Date : 6/18/2007
3. Category (EB2/3) : EB3
I don't know the priority date of my friend.
2. Approval Date : 6/18/2007
3. Category (EB2/3) : EB3
I don't know the priority date of my friend.
more...
Blog Feeds
08-03 12:50 PM
A Federal Judge has certified a nationwide class in a challenge to the USCIS's restrictive interpretation of the "automatic conversion" clause in the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) of 2002. This opens the way for children who have "aged-out" to be reunited with their parents. The USCIS has resisted implementing this important section of law for the past seven years. Just a few weeks ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), in Matter of Wang, adopted the government's restrictive interpretation of the automatic conversion clause. On July 16, Federal Judge James Selna (Central District, California), over government objections, made his...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/07/cspa-update.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/07/cspa-update.html)
prem_goel
09-07 07:11 PM
Hi Guys,
My sis recently changed her status successfully from B1 to H1. After the approval however (within 10-20 days), we saw soft LUDs on her previous H1 petitions (they were both with the same employer). The status hasn't changed however.
Has anyone experienced such a case?
One more thing - she had done her AR-11 address change online about a month ago. Could that have triggered these soft LUDs? If so, will they even go and change the address on petitions approved in the past?
Any inputs appreciated. Thanks.
My sis recently changed her status successfully from B1 to H1. After the approval however (within 10-20 days), we saw soft LUDs on her previous H1 petitions (they were both with the same employer). The status hasn't changed however.
Has anyone experienced such a case?
One more thing - she had done her AR-11 address change online about a month ago. Could that have triggered these soft LUDs? If so, will they even go and change the address on petitions approved in the past?
Any inputs appreciated. Thanks.
more...
justsomeguy
11-01 12:10 AM
Folks,
Here's one question I have which I haven't see in any forums so far (perhaps its lurking somewhere .. who knows) ... let me get to the point.
When filing for AOS/485, if the I-140 that was filed prior to filing AOS was pending and gets approved AFTER 485 was filed... should we explicitly inform USCIS that that 140 was appoved ?
I guess USCIS should have that information (of course!) but I am not sure if we should be pro-active and make sure we inform the service center that the 140 was approved ?!
Thanks for your time.
Here's one question I have which I haven't see in any forums so far (perhaps its lurking somewhere .. who knows) ... let me get to the point.
When filing for AOS/485, if the I-140 that was filed prior to filing AOS was pending and gets approved AFTER 485 was filed... should we explicitly inform USCIS that that 140 was appoved ?
I guess USCIS should have that information (of course!) but I am not sure if we should be pro-active and make sure we inform the service center that the 140 was approved ?!
Thanks for your time.
2010 photo | Keira Knightley
anujdhamija
10-24 09:09 PM
I currently hold H4 visa. I got H1 approval (consular) this year. Now instead of applying by consular process (in London), I want to join my spouse on H4 and then apply for COS from within USA.
1. Can I do this?
2. If Yes, how? Which form do I have to fill ? Kindly detail the procedure with applicable costs.
3. When I later, travel outside US, do I then have to have H1 visa stamped in my passport?
4. If Yes, does this 1st visa have to be from home country or could be from Canada etc.?
P.S. I do not have any educational or work background in USA.
1. Can I do this?
2. If Yes, how? Which form do I have to fill ? Kindly detail the procedure with applicable costs.
3. When I later, travel outside US, do I then have to have H1 visa stamped in my passport?
4. If Yes, does this 1st visa have to be from home country or could be from Canada etc.?
P.S. I do not have any educational or work background in USA.
more...
ranand00
02-20 09:22 AM
Hi I am eb-3 India
my i-485 status online says- On December 3, 2007 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days.
my priority date is not current.
what do i need to do
thanks
ann
my i-485 status online says- On December 3, 2007 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days.
my priority date is not current.
what do i need to do
thanks
ann
hair Keira Knightley Hairstyles
thomachan72
11-09 08:52 AM
According to the mathew ohio website. there is apparently a very hot legal battle going on between the DHS and a happless immigrant who had been arested for out of status presence. The immigrant was on an H1b and had filed an application in a timely manner and was awaiting decision on his application when the DHS official arrested him and tried to deport him. Please post more information on this issue if anybody is aware of it. His I-94 expired, however, his petition for H1b extension was pending!!!!:o:o:o
more...
ivp33
05-30 05:56 PM
Hello forum participants.
I am a dependent on an I-485 application, with my father being the primary applicant. The application has been pending since 2001, so I decided to first threaten USCIS with a lawsuit, and then maybe file a writ of mandamus. My question is whether I have authority to do so as a dependent. Can I represent the whole family or at least myself? My father is leaving the country for some time and it will be hard for him to participate in the process.
Thanks!
I am a dependent on an I-485 application, with my father being the primary applicant. The application has been pending since 2001, so I decided to first threaten USCIS with a lawsuit, and then maybe file a writ of mandamus. My question is whether I have authority to do so as a dependent. Can I represent the whole family or at least myself? My father is leaving the country for some time and it will be hard for him to participate in the process.
Thanks!
hot Keira Knightley Hairstyles
hlangmo
June 11th, 2005, 10:13 AM
Here are a few pics from a boat trip i had yesterday.
Hope you like them
Hope you like them
more...
house Keira Knightley
ksvreg
04-18 01:58 PM
I am planning to renew my passport. Current passport is going to expire in October 2008.
Currently my I-485 is pending. If I renew my passport, do I need to update my renewed passport number to USCIS?
Currently my I-485 is pending. If I renew my passport, do I need to update my renewed passport number to USCIS?
tattoo Keira Knightley#39;s wavy bob
gcformeornot
12-28 01:35 PM
receipt no then FOIA might be a way....
more...
pictures keira knightley hairstyles
ysramu
11-28 12:08 PM
My wife received Appt. letter for FP second time. It mentioned that first time FP didn't pass thru FBI check, se she need to come again at no cost. Is this normal and did it happen to any one? We are in Atlanta.
dresses keira knightley bob. keira
Blog Feeds
04-08 08:40 AM
In a post last summer ("The Immigration Singularity"), I accused the Department of State (DOS) of hoodwinking the Office of Management and Budget by getting OMB to approve use of a new, all-purpose nonimmigrant visa application form, the DS-160, without submitting the form itself for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act: In my view, State snookered OMB in approving the release of the DS-160 under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) without providing the public with access to a complete copy of the form and all the questions posed. The purpose of the PRA is to reduce the burden of completing...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/immigration-quantum-leaping-and-lying-the-ds160-visa-application.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/immigration-quantum-leaping-and-lying-the-ds160-visa-application.html)
more...
makeup keira knightley hairstyles. Keira Knightley Hairstyles
niklshah
09-19 10:58 AM
It was really a proud moment for me and my wife to be part of rally yesterday. I felt really good that i am trying to do something about the situation. Hats off to aman kapoor and other core members who are putting their heart and sould into this fight even though they have their green cards already. As per the message conveyed in rally our real work begins now as we have to educate the congress members about the differance of legal and illegal immigration process. we should also try to involve as many members as possible who were not able to attend the rally due to their personal situation to be active in this education process. again salute to aman kapoor and core member team.
girlfriend Keira Knightley Hair
eb3rowstuck
05-14 07:51 PM
Talked to my lawyer today. I am in EB3ROW and my PD is current as of June bulletin. Unfortunately, NSC is not processing my receipt dates yet, so I have not heard anything.
Lawyer said that there is a chance EB3ROW will retrogress in July or become "Unavailable".
Will I be back to the Retrogression line in that case or will USCIS still process? Any idea? Anyone in the same boat?
Lawyer said that there is a chance EB3ROW will retrogress in July or become "Unavailable".
Will I be back to the Retrogression line in that case or will USCIS still process? Any idea? Anyone in the same boat?
hairstyles isn#39;t this Keira Knightley
Macaca
02-18 06:55 PM
Some paras from In Majority, Democrats Run Hill Much as GOP Did (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR2007021701352.html).
Democrats pledged to bring courtesy to the Capitol when they assumed control of Congress last month. But from the start, the new majority used its muscle to force through its agenda in the House and sideline Republicans.
And after an initial burst of lawmaking, the Democratic juggernaut has kept on rolling.
Of nine major bills passed by the House since the 110th Congress began, Republicans have been allowed to make amendments to just one, a measure directing federal research into additives to biofuels. In the arcane world of Capitol Hill, where the majority dictates which legislation comes before the House and which dies on a shelf, the ability to offer amendments from the floor is one of the minority's few tools.
Last week, the strong-arming continued during the most important debate the Congress has faced yet -- the discussion about the Iraq war. Democrats initially said they would allow Republicans to propose one alternative to the resolution denouncing a troop buildup but, days later, they thought better of it.
And yet, significant numbers of House Republicans have voted along with Democrats on the legislation passed so far -- a fact that somewhat mutes criticism about iron-fisted tactics.
In the first weeks of the new Congress, however, Democrats bypassed the usual legislative committees, refused to allow any amendments and took their agenda straight to the floor for passage. They said they needed a clear path to pass a handful of popular measures that were the basis of their successful November campaign, including expanded money for stem cell research, an increase in the federal minimum wage and implementation of recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission.
Democrats said they would impose "regular order," the rules that permit the minority to participate more widely, in short order.
But even after passing their domestic agenda, Democratic leaders have continued to marginalize Republicans, preventing them from having a voice in legislation such as a bill to withhold federal pensions from lawmakers convicted of ethics felonies and a $463 billion bill to fund the federal government for the rest of this fiscal year.
Last week's debate on the Iraq war, culminating in its passage Friday by a vote of 246 to 182, was conducted under a "closed rule," which means Republicans could not offer alternatives. "I understand what they did on their agenda," said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). "But to do a closed rule on something like this is a huge mistake. We're talking about war and peace. You don't play politics with war."
While they did not allow amendments on the Iraq debate, the Democrats gave every member of the chamber five minutes to speak on the resolution -- an unprecedented amount of debate on a nonbinding resolution, according to Thomas E. Mann, a scholar at Brookings Institution. He said that is more than the Republicans offered Democrats when the GOP passed a resolution last spring supporting the war in Iraq.
Democrats pledged to bring courtesy to the Capitol when they assumed control of Congress last month. But from the start, the new majority used its muscle to force through its agenda in the House and sideline Republicans.
And after an initial burst of lawmaking, the Democratic juggernaut has kept on rolling.
Of nine major bills passed by the House since the 110th Congress began, Republicans have been allowed to make amendments to just one, a measure directing federal research into additives to biofuels. In the arcane world of Capitol Hill, where the majority dictates which legislation comes before the House and which dies on a shelf, the ability to offer amendments from the floor is one of the minority's few tools.
Last week, the strong-arming continued during the most important debate the Congress has faced yet -- the discussion about the Iraq war. Democrats initially said they would allow Republicans to propose one alternative to the resolution denouncing a troop buildup but, days later, they thought better of it.
And yet, significant numbers of House Republicans have voted along with Democrats on the legislation passed so far -- a fact that somewhat mutes criticism about iron-fisted tactics.
In the first weeks of the new Congress, however, Democrats bypassed the usual legislative committees, refused to allow any amendments and took their agenda straight to the floor for passage. They said they needed a clear path to pass a handful of popular measures that were the basis of their successful November campaign, including expanded money for stem cell research, an increase in the federal minimum wage and implementation of recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission.
Democrats said they would impose "regular order," the rules that permit the minority to participate more widely, in short order.
But even after passing their domestic agenda, Democratic leaders have continued to marginalize Republicans, preventing them from having a voice in legislation such as a bill to withhold federal pensions from lawmakers convicted of ethics felonies and a $463 billion bill to fund the federal government for the rest of this fiscal year.
Last week's debate on the Iraq war, culminating in its passage Friday by a vote of 246 to 182, was conducted under a "closed rule," which means Republicans could not offer alternatives. "I understand what they did on their agenda," said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). "But to do a closed rule on something like this is a huge mistake. We're talking about war and peace. You don't play politics with war."
While they did not allow amendments on the Iraq debate, the Democrats gave every member of the chamber five minutes to speak on the resolution -- an unprecedented amount of debate on a nonbinding resolution, according to Thomas E. Mann, a scholar at Brookings Institution. He said that is more than the Republicans offered Democrats when the GOP passed a resolution last spring supporting the war in Iraq.
smartboy75
07-19 04:56 PM
Source www.immigration-law.com
Single EAD/AP Issued in Error and Invalid for AP Purpose
There have been some reports on the internet that people received EAD card with AP on it. According to the AILA, the USCIS issued such card in error. The EAD will be valid but AP note on the card is invalid. The USCIS advises them to contact the agency for instructions to obtain replacement card. Isn't there a saying that when one gets something which is too hard to believe to be true, then it is not true. Single EAD/AP card will not be issued until they announce such in the future!
Single EAD/AP Issued in Error and Invalid for AP Purpose
There have been some reports on the internet that people received EAD card with AP on it. According to the AILA, the USCIS issued such card in error. The EAD will be valid but AP note on the card is invalid. The USCIS advises them to contact the agency for instructions to obtain replacement card. Isn't there a saying that when one gets something which is too hard to believe to be true, then it is not true. Single EAD/AP card will not be issued until they announce such in the future!
crystal
08-04 01:09 PM
What is so unique?
Everything is answered here (not latest though)
http://www.murthy.com/news/UDac21qa.html
Everything is answered here (not latest though)
http://www.murthy.com/news/UDac21qa.html
No comments:
Post a Comment